Posts

Showing posts from June, 2009

Thanks Advance Shoring MN Institute 4 Justice Eminent Domain

Image
Follow on Sharon4Anderson (Sharon4Anderson) on Twitter and Facebook Home Sharon Anderson Our Eminent Domain Advance Shoring Win, St.Paul Port Authority LOSS http://www.ij.org/index.php?option=com_c ontent&task=view&id=2408&Itemid=165 You like this. Sharon Anderson Institute for Justice : Thanks Advance Shoring re: http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com Cases St. Paul Minn. Property Rights Saint Paul Port Authority v. Advance Shoring Company Beyond Its Authority: Eminent Domain Abuse By the St. Paul Port Authority The St. Paul Port Authority is pursuing a scheme that could gut Minnesota’s popular 2006 comprehensive eminent domain reforms that protect homes, small businesses and farms from eminent domain for private gain. In mid-September 2008, the Port Authority announced its intention to take the property of Advance Shoring Company, a successful business that has operated for generations in St. Paul, to make way for a private development project that amounts to que

MinnPost - Coleman-Franken recount: GOP activist seeks to count unopened absentee ballots

MinnPost - Coleman-Franken recount: GOP activist seeks to count unopened absentee ballots Shared via AddThis
Image
Essling Moermond 3 Jun09 8.Pdf Excess Cons.11 View more PDF documents from Sharon Anderson .

Tom Roggee 842 Clear v. City St.Paul,MN Joel Essling

City Council Meeting Go to item 47 re Tom Rogge at 842 Clear Ave St. Paul,MN QUESTIONS: Has Joel Essling exceeded his Jurisdiction/Authority YES Has Joel Essling given special treatment re: MS609.43 because his brother is a Lawyer YES Essling 3Jun09_Rogge Sharon Anderson v City St.Paul Joel Essling - Google Search 47. Resolution Ratifying Assessment - 09-614 - In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost, and expenses for summary abatement (property cleanup) on private properties from February 13-25, 2009 [J0905A]; weekly garbage hauling services from February 18-26, 2009 [J0904G]; summary abatement for excessive consumption of inspection services for property code violations billed from May 21 to December 5, 2008 [J0901E]; and removing diseased elm trees from private properties during February 2009 [0902T]. (GS 3068978) (Legislative Hearing Officer recommends the following: 1326 Albemarle Street (J0901E) - delete the assessment; 1067 Burns Avenue (J0904G) - approve the a

Tom Rogge 842 Clear Ave v. City St.Paul,Joel Essling et al MS609.43

Disclaimer: Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson and Bill Dahn both vitcimized by www.sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com Watched Channel 18 Wed.3Jun09 , Items 47, listening to Victim Thomas C. Rogge at 842 Clear Ave St.Paul MN, stating: DSI Inspector Joel Essling was stalking and harrassing, stating one second of personal property in the yard, would be tagged? Essling 3Jun09_Rogge 06/03/2009 Video Open Video Only in Windows Media Player 01h 42m Agenda Watch the Video: Is DSI Inspector Joel Essling ruining the Health,Safety,Welfare of the citizenery by Essling "overkill" excessive consumption fee's to inflate Assessment/Fees for Esslings pecuniary gain? Essling 3Jun09_Rogge Has Joel Essling exceeded his Authority/Jurisdiction as his brother is a lawyer? sharon anderson v. joel essling mn - Google Search